>FASTA_6

23&Me bankrupt, BodyOids, At-home insemination, Nanopore protein sequencing, GRIDX US Tour

Biopunk shares perspectives on biotech across the tree of life. Join hundreds of academia and industry experts from the world’s top universities and companies who stay updated updated on the science, business, and philosophy of biotech with weekly Biotech Notes, exclusive interviews with biotech leaders, and visionary posts — It’s FREE!

Breaking: 23&Me bankrupt

Once a pioneer in consumer biotech services, the Wojcicki-led company has been busy dying for at least four years now. Declining sales, the 2023 cyber attack, a shift of focus towards drug discovery, and failing to capture value from the exponential decline in DNA sequencing have all been part of the story.

Co-founder Linda Avey shared her thoughts on a LinkedIn post, mainly exhibiting discontent with how the company was run after her departure in 2009:

There are many cautionary tales buried in the 23andMe story. Striking a balance between the desire for founder control and board oversight is essential; otherwise, why have a board at all?

Many users are reasonably worried for who will own their data and what they’ll do with it if the founder’s third bid for the company doesn’t come through. Meanwhile, the new technological and cultural zeitgeist is placing health insights in patients’ hands. Just in time, I’ve got my Nucleus Genomics test results — Stay tuned for that video ;D

Philosophy corner: Bodyoids

A full-blown human body derived from your stem cells and grown in an artificial womb. It looks like you, it is you from the DNA to its expression in every single trait. Except it’s been bioengineered to lack sentience or the ability to feel pain. Thus, you can use this ‘clone’ to harvest young and healthy organs to replace in yourself — Kidney giving you trouble lately? Use your clone’s! Need some blood? Your Bodyoid’s here for ya. Want to A/B test a new therapy that may be a little risky? You’ve got your double… or triple, or a whole Garden of You 🙊

An ethical aberration? The cure to all disease? Both? None? So far the arguments against human genetic engineering have focused too much on enhancement and the threat of bioweapons. What about human dehancement, or reduction, from the moment “one is” a single-cell, or even starting from sexual gametes?

Physical technologies like bodyoids and neuron-made computers present an alternative to the long-held vision of isolated 3D bio-printed organs or even digital simulations of the human body. However, clear technical questions still seem hard to surmount, like how to grow an 18-year-old heart without having to wait 18 years, and before that, how to even grow a baby.

For controversial and often stupid Jiankui He’s tweets may seem, he may be right in one point: we need new ethical frameworks for new biology. As Julian Huxley would point out since last century, New Bottles for New Wine.

Interesting company: Frida Fertility’s at-home insemination